Tuesday, August 08, 2006
I've moved
http://mattymil.spaces.live.com
Monday, May 08, 2006
Monday, March 13, 2006
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
Saturday, March 04, 2006
Enslaved
2 Peter 2:19 (AMP)
Thursday, March 02, 2006
I Like Rice.
-From nationaljournal.com
Who?
From the NationalJunal.com
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
Cellulosic Ethanol
m
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Oil
Obviously there has been and will continue to be great political pressure placed on the companies that have posted such banner earnings both from the general public and the government. As to the argument of who is right, what is excessive, and the public responsibility in matters such as these I will not endeavor at this time. What I will touch on briefly is this. The proposed senate solution, as reported in the above referenced article, to these enlarged profits is to increase the tax burden on the oil companies. This will do nothing but fill the pockets of the government with the already stretched funds of the consumer. I base this upon a simple lesson that many of us learned (and appear to have forgotten) in Macroeconomics 101. The tax burden that is placed on the consumer is directly proportional to the inelasticity of the demand. The market for energy is at this point very inelastic. Therefore the government can tax the suppliers all they want and the majority of the deadweight loss will be passed to the side of the consumer.
The quickest though possibly the most difficult way to resolve our fossil fuel dilemmas is to allow the market to correct itself. Let the oil companies operate as they have and they will soon find that they have driven, (by virtue of excessive price) the consumer away from the wares they are peddling and into the open arms of the dealers selling the next generation of energy resources.
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Saturday, December 31, 2005
Simplify
Cookies
The spirit of giving.
I heard this damn Oak Ridge Boys song the other day; it’s about Christmas cookies and how much the Oak Ridge Boys love them, and they were performing it on TV at 5:00 in the morning.
Apparently, any music I hear at 5:00 in the morning sticks in my head for a long time. Especially the part of the song when the bass-voiced Oak Ridge Boy says, “Oh yeah,” and “Mmhmm,” after the chorus.
My holiday gift to you is not posting an mp3 of the song here on this page to ambush you, thereby lodging it in your head, too. Just a little bit of seasonal generosity, and you’re welcome.
The truth is that I couldn’t find a copy of the song for free and there’s no way I’m paying good money for an Oak Ridge Boys song about cookies. Or, really, an Oak Ridge Boys song about anything or, for that matter, probably any song about cookies by anyone except Cookie Monster. So it turns out that I’m both seasonally ungenerous and cheap. And also a cookie song snob.
Bah. Humbug.
Tiny
I would tell you the exact number of tiny humans who have been living under my floorboards undetected until today—building tiny buildings and driving tiny cars, even founding a tiny university with a tiny pond and an supertiny scale model of the campus in the tiny visitors’ center—but I don’t think you would believe me because it’s a very big number.
Choice
It occurred to me recently that our only true unfettered liberty is our freedom to choose. Our “God given” liberties pale in comparison to this one shining example of pure an unadulterated freedom.
Tuesday, December 27, 2005
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Tmesis
In grammar and rhetoric, the separation of the parts of a compound word, now generally done for humorous effect; for example, "what place soever" instead of "whatsoever place," or "abso-bloody-lutely."
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Occupation
My six year old indicated today that after long contemplation he has decided to change career paths from an FBI agent to Santa Claus. I instructed him to submit his resume to the UN office of philanthropy, and holiday cheer christmas division….
Sunday, December 11, 2005
Friday, December 09, 2005
Kitsch
After viewing a movie yesterday evening that didn’t have a “happy” ending, my wife stated, “I didn’t care for that movie”. I responded “it was probably because it didn’t have a pat, kitschy, ending” that provided closure for all involved. The conversation that ensued as a result of this exchange grew rather intense and didn’t close with a happy ending either.
Later, as I considered this exchange, it occurred to me that Danielle’s response is not uncommon, particularly in the main stream culture of America. For some reason, we have come to place a high value on successful causutums and have cast off the unsuccessful and difficult outcomes as mere detritus having no value or use. It is possible that this is a result of our being conditioned by much of the media that we are exposed to on a regular basis. I am sure there are other reasons as well but the discovery of those is for another discussion.
I would argue though, that while it is not wrong to expect all of our endeavours to turn out successfully, and that it is a basic requirement for their success, we should not overlook the import of adverse outcomes, and difficult circumstances. In fact we should look forward to them if at all possible. I can attest, that had it not been for the difficult circumstances in my own life, I would not be as valuable to my peers, my family and anyone else in my “marketplace” as I am. Most likely anyone who reads this could attest to the same thing, that the adverse times in their lives sharpened and honed them, and even knocked off the excess useless material that was holding them down from their full potential.
To take a broader perspective, consider if you will, the free market system. The new technology, and innovative strategies that are produced by it are a result of there being an inequity or inefficiency that catalyzed these advances. In other words, circumstances became uncomfortable enough that it drove someone to seek out a solution to a problem. It is very plain by this example that the struggles of individuals or groups more times than not results in improvement.
